An optimistic look ahead to the 2011 Voyageurs Cup
As reported by Rollins (who else?) this morning, it seems as though Canada will have a fourth fully professional soccer team in 2011, the NASL’s Edmonton Drillers. Now, this has yet to be “officially” confirmed (though I don’t doubt the validity of Duane’s sources), and There’s the tricky issue of what, exactly, will become of the NASL in 2011 (will it continue to function alongside the USL under the USSF Division II banner, or break away on its own?) And will the league attain sanctioning by the USSF, without which its member teams would be ineligible to compete in the CONCACAF Champions League (the endgame for the winner of the Voyageurs Cup)?
For now, let’s defer all of those questions. There was much talk of revamping the format of the Voyageurs Cup after the debacle in the closing game of last year’s tourney, wherein the Whitecaps were deprived of the crown by a listless, disinterested Montreal B-squad allowing Toronto FC to thump six goals past them. But as I said on an episode of It’s Called Football last week, there’s really only so much you can do with a tournament that only has three teams involved. With four, the possibilities are much wider.
Here are some ideas for how the 2011 Voyageurs Cup might look, and feel free to add your own.
Current format, just plunk on a fourth squad. So, each team plays home-and-away against every other team, with the leader in points at the end of the round robin being declared the champion. Total games played by each team: 6.
Current format with a championship game. Many people (myself included) were advocating this system even with the current three-team structure, but we won’t see it this year. But as has been said, having a one-off championship game — between the two top teams from the home-and-away round-robin — helps build recognition and relevance for the tournament in the minds of casual fans. The only issue could be schedule congestion if you’re adding a fourth team, but this is something for the logistical minds at the various leagues to sort out. Total games played by each team: minimum 6, maximum 7.
Regional and national home-and-away. Go with me for a second here. To cut down on travel time and build regional rivalries, we cut straight to a west/east semi-final two-leg setup. Vancouver plays Edmonton in a home-and-away aggregate-goals series, while Toronto and Montreal do the same. Winners of each face off in another home-and-away for the Voyageurs Cup. Less schedule congestion, and there’s the “championship showdown” aspect… though a team could go years without ever meeting a Canadian rival. Total games played by each team: minimum 2, maximum 4.
Round-robin total goals aggregate. You want a way to build excitement (if by “excitement” you mean “goals scored”)? Have a home-and-away round-robin, as in the first two setups, but eliminate the relevance of wins and losses… standings determined only by total goals scored. This way, no team is ever eliminated until they play their last game. Edmonton could lose its first five contests, but a 16-0 victory in their final matchup could still clinch them the trophy!
Just give the trophy to Toronto FC. This seems to be the natural order of things, in the minds of some Reds supporters.
If the new Edmonton team — and its affiliation with the MLS Whitecaps — does pan out, this is truly a great day for Canadian soccer. Having four fully pro teams is getting us dangerously close to what former Canada head coach Tony Waiters identified as the key to the country’s success — a true domestic league. Yes, I’m getting way ahead of myself, but when you’re a Canadian soccer fan, you grasp at whatever optimism you can spot.
February 9, 2010 at 1:55 pm
The problem with a regional system will come when Montreal goes up to MLS. Two MLS clubs playing every year in the east, an MLS club and a possible NASL affiliate in the west. Not very fair to rivals of the Whitecaps.
So I’m all for it!
February 10, 2010 at 1:03 pm
Where would the final be played? Neutral site? Home and home?
February 12, 2010 at 11:22 am
Would a 2-legged cup format be way off base? 16 teams with each round being a home and home. 8 games maximum. The 4 pro teams plus 12 others. The others should include the Canadian Amateur Champion for the previous October (playing in the snow in Saskatchewan should be worth something). As far as I know the PCSL clubs play down for this competition but the CSL clubs do not. The CSL website is announcing Hamilton Croatia as its 11th team. That’s the 12 “Others”. If the semi-pro landscape in Canada expands, maybe a qualifier event is played to play down to 4 teams to pair up against the 4 pro team.
The idea to expanding the Voyageurs Cup should be to expose the rest of Canada to Pro soccer. Hellas SC hosting Toronto FC should be a positive. Unfortunately the view is “how is Hellas going to pay to get to Toronto”. A club like Hellas should be able to gain some extra money from hosting this game. Players get a chance to “run with the big boys” and show off their skills. The fans and club members need to make that link from amateur to semi-pro to pro. Hellas playing against North York Astros might reveal that they can indeed compete. Maybe then the investment comes through and the clubs and leagues get upgraded, if only a little.
So many ideas, I could ramble all day. The CSA needs to lay down some goals for this tournament beyond selecting a Champions League rep.
February 16, 2010 at 1:51 pm
I’m all for including both the PCSL and CSL champs each year. Ha… maybe we could even throw in the Lynx for some nostalgia!
February 17, 2010 at 10:19 pm
You east coast guys are funny, the fix is simple really, no need to get at all complicated. Keep the format the same except make the deciding factor in the event of a tie, head to head record. this way the meaningless game that was the “Miracle in Montreal” (I always get a kick out of that one) stays that way… meaningless.
What I mean by this is that even though TFC and Vancouver would have tied at a game a piece then decide the winner with total goals against that specific team, basically an aggregate score in this case Vancouver would have won with a 2 – 1 agg score. This would be a more fair approach then to just leaving another teams fate in the hands of amateurs. Do Santos was just being a good coach but the image of it all was very damaging to the tourney itself.
CSA should fix this quick because if it happened in just the second year, then it will most definitely happen again.
March 29, 2010 at 10:39 am
What about amalgamating the current Natiional Amateur Championships and Nutrilite Canadian Championship. i.e. allow the proteams (Impact, TFC) to play in their respective provincial cups and if they win that cup face off against other provincial cup winners. It would make use of an existing structure.
Just a thought.